http://fromrequired.livejournal.com/ (
fromrequired.livejournal.com) wrote in
revolution_fr2011-03-27 12:19 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Question about Robespierre and The Terror
I don't have much knowledge about the French Revolution (as you can tell by looking at my userpic, I'm more of a WWII fangirl) but I'm greatly interested in it.
So in my AP Euro History class, we had to watch this documentary about the French Revolution. I'll post a part of it below:
I'm sort of lost because I thought Robespierre originally was for the rights of the poor and the ordinary people? It doesn't seem plausible to me that he can just turn into a sanguinary dictator overnight. Even in my textbook it says that Robespierre killed everyone whom he deemed unfit for his "Republic of Virtue," but history is never that simple. I know, I study WWII ;)
Anyways, can y'all people enlighten me about the cause of The Terror and Robespierre's role in it? Sorry if I'm asking too many questions.
EDIT: Here's the part that succeeds it. It basically describes the fall of Robespierre and says he inspired later dictatorships and revolutions.
So in my AP Euro History class, we had to watch this documentary about the French Revolution. I'll post a part of it below:
I'm sort of lost because I thought Robespierre originally was for the rights of the poor and the ordinary people? It doesn't seem plausible to me that he can just turn into a sanguinary dictator overnight. Even in my textbook it says that Robespierre killed everyone whom he deemed unfit for his "Republic of Virtue," but history is never that simple. I know, I study WWII ;)
Anyways, can y'all people enlighten me about the cause of The Terror and Robespierre's role in it? Sorry if I'm asking too many questions.
EDIT: Here's the part that succeeds it. It basically describes the fall of Robespierre and says he inspired later dictatorships and revolutions.
no subject
I haven't read any of his works yet, and by the sounds of it, I don't think I want to.
As for the forbidden documentary, I got curious and watched the first 2 minutes of it on Youtube; I think I'm traumatized for the rest of my life. I don't know much about the French Revolution, but it's a common sense that there were no emos during the 18th century (referring to the guy with the emo hair; think he might be Robespierre's secretary or something?).
But yeah, I probably shouldn't have watched it...
no subject
And the emo guy supposedly is... Saint-Just! ;___; He was a very prominent revolutionary like Robespierre, but this documentary make you think that he was Robespierre's valet. That is how they are destroying him.
There is an essay (http://community.livejournal.com/revolution_fr/88673.html) here about this. I found this community googling for something like it.
no subject
But how does one go from this: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/59/Saint_Just.jpg/200px-Saint_Just.jpg to this: http://content2.myyearbook.com/zenhex/images/quiz47/231395/231395_res1_sexy.jpg
? I don't know much about this Saint-Just person, but if he was a prominent Revolutionary, I doubt that he would have acted like Robespierre's valet... Thank you for the link, by the way!
no subject
Or maybe... *inserts a paranoid theory here*
no subject
Not to mention that the actor playing Robespierre doesn't resemble him at all.Or maybe... they're trying to depict Saint-Just as a pissed-off teenager in a deliberate attempt to discredit him. I don't know. Either way, the documentary sucks.