http://victoriavandal.livejournal.com/ (
victoriavandal.livejournal.com) wrote in
revolution_fr2008-07-25 02:22 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
And more French Rev on the radio on saturday 26th and 2nd...
The filmscript for the film that Richard (Gandhi) Attenborough has never managed to get made, on Tom Paine in the American and French revolutions, is being broadcast in two parts as radio plays, 2.30-4pm BST (British Summer Time) this saturday 26th July, and next sat, 2nd August. "These Are The Times" by Trevor Griffiths. The first part is the American war of Independence, the Second part, on the 2nd, the part covering the Revolution (Paine was sentenced to death in Britain for sedition, fled to France, was elected to the Convention, then sentenced to death there as well!). There's an interview with Trevor Griffiths on the script - which he's spent 20 years on - online, on the BBC website ' listen again facility - it'll be up there till monday. Front Row, Tuesday 22nd, about 14 minutes into the programme. http://209.85.215.104/search?q=cache:a1_SLsISdAoJ:www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/arts/frontrow/past_programmes.shtml+these+are+the+times+radio+4+part+two&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&client=safari
The plays themselves should be available online for 7 days after broadcast.
The plays themselves should be available online for 7 days after broadcast.
no subject
Screenwriters, who often have political agendas to their pieces, love nothing more than to assign political motives for studios' reluctance to finance their projects, but this is pretty much never the case. Studios want and need above all to make money, and politically incorrect projects are often more profitable, not less. Also, criticizing Washington is and has been a favorite pastime of Americans (and Brits!), regardless of who happens to be in power at the moment, and certainly regimes have come and gone over the past 20 years. Your reasoning is much more likely to be correct; one colossally failed project can sink several similar ones after it. Studio executives typically pass on a project for one of the following reasons: they feel there is not enough general public interest in the topic to generate good business (there is a notorious perception that history pictures are often critcally acclaimed but rarely blockbusters); they feel that although the topic would generate wide interest the project would be so costly to produce as to limit profitability (as you pointed out CGI is now cutting costs dramatically); or they feel the script is just not very well executed, often because it makes for a good piece of literature, but not very good cinema. Recognizing these factors would probably be the first step toward getting a project like this made.
no subject
It's a great script, but as it isn't full of action or sex, I can't see it being done on the big screen. Almost all cinemas are teenager-oriented multiplexes now, and I can't see that changing (even 'art house' cinemas play safe these days). It would work on TV, though - and as a lot of stuff is now British/US co-production it could happen...