http://estellacat.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] revolution_fr 2009-01-23 12:21 am (UTC)

I've observed that too, and it's truly a shame. I mean, if it's necessary to understand history for no other reason, it's precisely because 200 year-old politics is still relevant, being the basis for, say, 100 year-old politics, which is in turn the basis for 50 year-old politics, and so on until the present... But what was the context of this particular explanation?
(21 comments)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.