ext_311538 (
missweirdness.livejournal.com) wrote in
revolution_fr2009-07-12 11:12 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
TERROR, on YOUTUBE!
Yeah, i guess what i found on youtube?
That dreadful Terror! Robespierre and the french revolution..
here's the link -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcZxrb_L0_M
part 1 of 9, hahahah
enjoy =O
I'm watching now..=(
now discuss!
That dreadful Terror! Robespierre and the french revolution..
here's the link -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcZxrb_L0_M
part 1 of 9, hahahah
enjoy =O
and apparently the emo GUY is ST. JUST! GASP!
now discuss!
(frozen comment) no subject
By the way, if you have anything good to add up to contribute to the debate, or, I don't know, to this community at all -- who are you? -- please do so.
(frozen comment) no subject
HanriotFran
(frozen comment) no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-07-15 09:28 am (UTC)(link)(frozen comment) no subject
Have you ever seen, or read, -anything- about the French revolution that wasn't ideologically manipulated. That's what it's there for. Anyone who talks or writes about it does so because they have a comment to make... That's half what makes it so interesting,compared to programmes about the Tudors where they just chat about Henry VIII's wives.
And if you were ever to write a book about the Jacobins, I would be sure to take everything you say with a pinch of salt, as well.
Most people who watch these programmes aren't stupid, either. They at least have some interest in history and how history works - i.e. this isn't a completely accurate unbiased account of what happened.
What more worries me is that a lot of people don't even know who Maximilien Robespierre is, at all. But these people probably wouldn't watch this programme, because they're just not interested in it.
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject
As far as my comment "By the way, if you have anything good to add up to contribute to the debate, or, I don't know, to this community at all -- who are you? -- please do so." was concerned, it was mostly to reply to the part of the comment "But I do get the impression that you guys will hate anything that deals with your favourite guys, especially English TV shows, that aren't all COMPLETELY ACCURATE".
I maintain that I have a right to say it anyway -- as we all have rights to say whatever we want, as we all obviously know *eyerolls* -- because I firmly believe that LJ communities are kept alive by the people who dare to post and comment in them, not by mysteriously appearing people who pop in suddenly to tell said people who contribute 'you're just angry because it attacks your favourite guys boo hoo' and enlightening the part 'especially English TV shows'. Well, English TV shows do happen to be pretty bad as far as the French Revolution is concerned, for obvious ideological reasons.
And maybe you should think of sharing the comments you also have on this so that we all know what you think as well, instead of just randomly jumping in to teach lessons to others?
P.S. And it's true: I don't know who she is. I was merely stating a fact.
(frozen comment) no subject
(frozen comment) no subject