Oh, of course you're right. But it's still highly significative to which figures "we" project them and to which we don't...I still find it highly significative to see when this "traumatic childhood" is used in a historiograhic explanation and when it's not. The same for the homoerotism...BTW, the men then had much less problems to express their FEELINGS for other men than the men of today, imo. We haven't progessed so much, with all that desire to classify the emotions and put them into labelled boxes. Anyway, it's another topic.