ext_365772 (
misatheredpanda.livejournal.com) wrote in
revolution_fr2010-03-02 04:15 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
CAMILLE DESMOULINS IS 250 TODAY!
I don't actually have anything to commemorate the event, sadly. However I would like to encourage you to spare a thought (and perhaps a few words, if you feel so inspired) for this man who slipped into history - and more than a few peoples' hearts in the past 250 years - against the odds. I could never express how grateful I am for it.
I don't actually have anything to commemorate the event, sadly. However I would like to encourage you to spare a thought (and perhaps a few words, if you feel so inspired) for this man who slipped into history - and more than a few peoples' hearts in the past 250 years - against the odds. I could never express how grateful I am for it.
no subject
sibylla_oo
2010-03-16 07:08 pm UTC (link)
Comment Posted Successfully
"He's almost completely vanished from recent English language histories."
My little theory is that this disappearance of other CPS members has to do with today's historiography's 1) love for strong king-like figures (therefore reduction of the Year Two to the struggle between Titans: Danton and Robespierre, Liberal Democracy vs. Totalitarianism...bleahghhhh) 2)the claim that Robespierre was a Mao-like dictator who decided everything - this makes the others quite irrelevant ("Robespierre's henchmen"), if not directly dangerous for the historian in question, as their very existence shows how nonsensical this interpretation is.
no subject
no subject