Characterization help?
Nov. 14th, 2007 09:36 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Hey all!
I'm writing a NaNoWriMo novel that takes place from approximately 1788- 1799 and being the crazed fangirl that I am, I'm including as many Jacobins as I can get away with. I think I've got a good handle on Robespierre, since he's the main object of my obsession, but I do confess that I have nooooooooo idea at all how to characterize Saint- Just and Desmoulins. Aside from physical descriptions, I'm not quite sure what to do personality- wise to keep them as close to life as possible.
I would look at other historical fiction books as a guide, but then we get blood-thirsty-psycopathic-murderer!Saint- Just and dumb-as-a-rock!Desmoulins and I would rather avoid those since I've figured out that they're pretty much complete fabrications.
Thank you so much to anyone who can shed some light on the subject!
I'm writing a NaNoWriMo novel that takes place from approximately 1788- 1799 and being the crazed fangirl that I am, I'm including as many Jacobins as I can get away with. I think I've got a good handle on Robespierre, since he's the main object of my obsession, but I do confess that I have nooooooooo idea at all how to characterize Saint- Just and Desmoulins. Aside from physical descriptions, I'm not quite sure what to do personality- wise to keep them as close to life as possible.
I would look at other historical fiction books as a guide, but then we get blood-thirsty-psycopathic-murderer!Saint- Just and dumb-as-a-rock!Desmoulins and I would rather avoid those since I've figured out that they're pretty much complete fabrications.
Thank you so much to anyone who can shed some light on the subject!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:26 am (UTC)I can't help you much on Saint-Just but I, um, seem to remember typing up a bunch of Camille Desmoulins ones..... A BIG bunch. (http://jesta-ariadne.livejournal.com/134242.html)
(...Please excuse/ignore all the spazzy fangirlish narration interspersed XDD I was trying to explain to people who didn't know much about it.... plus, I am a spazzy fangirl.)
Go you with NaNoWriMo!!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:42 am (UTC)and am biased): I wrote a 12-page dissertation on Saint-Just last year for my university course on the French Revolution -- the only problem is that it's in French. -_-; I was planning to translate it and post it somewhere, but I didn't have time yet.... I could write for you a little summary to describe, but that would need to get down my list of "All The Things I Have To Do For University And Am Already Lacking Time For". >_____>The first problem with Saint-Just is that, for people who are used to "simple" personalities, he seems "complex"
but since I'm complex myself, I don't find him too complex. The best sources to understand him are, for his youth, his literary texts (and by this, I mean, reading Organt in a critical way, not in a hysterical, victorian-like OMG!NUN!RAPE!DONKEY!SEX!SO!AWFUL!AND!DEBAUCHED -- in all, Organt tells you about young!Saint-Just's cynicism (as in Ancient-inspired Diogenes cynicism)), for his early years into the Revolution, when he was too young to be elected, there are his many letters, which reflect how impatient to take action he is, for his Convention years, there are a few passages from his speeches and from the Institutions républicaines which give clues on his personality.The things to be avoided are:
1) To think he was constantly extremist and "madder than Robespierre" -- the thing is that it's possible to interpret is personality as a lot more pragmatic, rational and calm than Robespierre, who was anxious bordering on nevrotic (and for reason's sake: it's not dramatic to be slightly nevrotic, as many historians since to believe it is -- come on, now, how many human beings are? and they are not living in the same circumstances at all!);
2) To think he was like the Ebil Eve who gave Maximilien!Adam the Ebil Apple of the Revolution and turned him into an Ebil man -- no, but you laugh here, but more than a half of the characterisations (especially the dantoniste ones) of Saint-Just present him as the one who's responsible for everything, and that if he hadn't been there, Robespierre wouldn't have gotten so "bad" (ex. the film La Révolution française: les années terribles -- for plain!evil!Lucifer-like!Saint-Just, there's A Place of Greater Safety, but you must know about this already).
3) The feminisation -- this is bloody getting on my nerves. "He was pretty like a girl." "He looked like a girl." "He was so pretty omg." Etc. Someday, I'll write an article about this. And will probably include it in my master degree. This is just far too irritating. And, on top of it, this constant feminisation of Saint-Just, following the classical reference to his "lyrical" and "admiring" letter to Robespierre just shows the latent homophoby of plenty of historians -- whether they are homosexuals or not is not the issue here, the problem is that historians pretend it (but never honestly write it) and use this to bash them, because they are OBVIOUSLY "abnormal" which explains why their socio-political ideas are also "abnormal".
Hm, yeah, so that's all I can think of for now.
P.S. What's a "NaNoWriMo" novel?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:46 am (UTC)you writing a novel: 50,000 words or more.
GO. i did it last year but i'm way too busy to do it this year, though it was a whole lot of fun and mad writing. seeing the crack of dawn and such.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:50 am (UTC)Thanks very much! I shall have to set aside a weekend for research now. ^^
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 03:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 04:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 04:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 04:08 am (UTC)I have posted this a few months ago thought: my (bad) translation of Saint-Just's early short text "La Raison à la morne". (http://community.livejournal.com/revolution_fr/21912.html) I like it a lot, mostly because the social critique is still actual -- you'd just have to change a few references and it's still the same. -_-; /socio-political editorial.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 05:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:24 am (UTC)He is gorgeous, but I don't get how that makes him "look like a girl" either. Maybe because he's not cowboy-rugged-marlboro man type handsome? So that makes him feminine? Or maybe it's just a case of convenient stereotyping--why think when you can regurgitate?
I've always thought of S-J as very masculine--not meathead masculine, but more like that thin but sinewy type.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:29 am (UTC)But I know exactly what you mean. Saint-Just strikes me as one of the least feminine men of the 18th century. (Considering what the popular styles and mannerisms of the era, that's not saying much, but I think you get my point.)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 07:51 am (UTC)I never seen a colored photo of the Greuze's portrait on your userpic! Couldn't I ask you, where did you find it?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 05:03 am (UTC)As for Saint-Just, I'll second
As far as Desmoulins goes, don't make him some sort of Glorious Martyr to Free Speech, because he wasn't that. Nor would I recommend making him incredibly innocent or unbelievably debauched. Don't try combining the two extremes either, because that never works. The best advice I can give where he's concerned is: forget, though it may be difficult, everything you've ever read about him coming from any fictional source. Also, avoid the cliché of making him Robespierre's Best Friend. There isn't really any evidence for that in the historical record, and it's far too overdone in fiction. (But then, I suppose this goes with my previous point.)
...Wow, it seems I had more to say on the subject than I thought. I hope it's helpful.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 05:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 05:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 06:21 am (UTC)I think I do have an explanation for it though: some novelist took the revolutionary rhetoric on SAID POLITICAL ENEMY WAS CONSPIRING WITH THE ENGLISH OMG a little too seriously? Though it's sort of hard to believe for Maxime... the English particularly hate him, maybe more than all the others.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 12:07 am (UTC)Perhaps. >__> The thing is, these are *French* (ci-devant, though none of them seems to be aware of it) aristos... It's all very strange.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 12:17 am (UTC)...French aristos? Why on Earth would they speak to Maxime? O.o;
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 12:25 am (UTC)According to the novel, he was their lawyer before the Revolution, and for some reason he's still friends with the bratty aristo narrator. *sighs*
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 12:28 am (UTC)It just makes no sense. I just give up. It can't be reasoned.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 12:31 am (UTC)It really can't--you'll see when I get the excerpts typed though. >__>
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 05:48 pm (UTC)But have a flick through/read some of the chapters of Hilary mantel's A place of greater safety (it's a fantastically written book although I know maelicia doesn't approve XDD - I haven't yet got to any saint-just bits, so I don't know how incorrect her interpretation of him will be). It's great for characterisation of camille. Have fun, good luck. :P
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-19 06:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 03:03 am (UTC)