http://victoriavandal.livejournal.com/ (
victoriavandal.livejournal.com) wrote in
revolution_fr2008-09-16 10:55 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Some people build model ships...
But this man.... http://boisdejustice.com/Home/Home.html
Hmm...!
If you can lightly skip over his take on the Revolution (he knows a lot about guillotines, but evidently not much about the 1790's!) the history page has a pre-1925 fire photo of the Paris guillotine blade and lunette. There was a fire in 1925 that destroyed Madame Tussauds in London, including, sadly, most of the Revolution and Napoleon artefacts, but the blade survived, though damaged - I don't know what became of the lunette (I last went when I was 5 or 6!). I suppose you have to take their word for it that it's the one: it's now billed as 'the blade that killed Marie-Antoinette' (and I bet they were tempted to add 'like in the movie'?), but if that's the case parts, if not all of it, must also have been used to kill - well, pretty well everyone that everyone here is interested in...which is a weird and horrible thought...
http://boisdejustice.com/History/History.html
(btw in case you didn't know, Tussaud also allegedly took Robespierre's 'death mask' -the Parisian place that makes copies believes it was actually taken in life, which is plausible - Washington had his cast in life, as did many politicians, poets etc. - but billing it as taken at the foot of the guillotine sounds more dramatic! http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/dec/01/france.art )
Gosh, I'm morbid today!
Hmm...!
If you can lightly skip over his take on the Revolution (he knows a lot about guillotines, but evidently not much about the 1790's!) the history page has a pre-1925 fire photo of the Paris guillotine blade and lunette. There was a fire in 1925 that destroyed Madame Tussauds in London, including, sadly, most of the Revolution and Napoleon artefacts, but the blade survived, though damaged - I don't know what became of the lunette (I last went when I was 5 or 6!). I suppose you have to take their word for it that it's the one: it's now billed as 'the blade that killed Marie-Antoinette' (and I bet they were tempted to add 'like in the movie'?), but if that's the case parts, if not all of it, must also have been used to kill - well, pretty well everyone that everyone here is interested in...which is a weird and horrible thought...
http://boisdejustice.com/History/History.html
(btw in case you didn't know, Tussaud also allegedly took Robespierre's 'death mask' -the Parisian place that makes copies believes it was actually taken in life, which is plausible - Washington had his cast in life, as did many politicians, poets etc. - but billing it as taken at the foot of the guillotine sounds more dramatic! http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/dec/01/france.art )
Gosh, I'm morbid today!
Re: 1790's and guillotine
I too collect books on the guillotine, most of them in French. I also collect photographs, news articles and historical information. When I read about reactions to my website I am often surprised to find how the subject appears to others... I guess I have grown calloused to those pictures and the information surrounding them. Spending three days this summer going over every inch of a real Berger guillotine that had actually been used, felt to me like I was visiting an "old friend". Every part of it seemed so familiar although it was the first one I had ever seen in person. I am very squimish when in comes to other gory photos/information. For example I wouldn't go on a site like oggrish-dot-com because I know it would make me sick. On the other hand, guillotines seem no more gory to me than a kitchen slicer...
Not to worry I also have more "normal" hobbies like collecting handguns, re-enacting Civil War battles and restoring WW-2 armored vehicles - Just kidding - but I do have a keen interest in Civil War and WW-2 history.
You are correct that my depiction of the French Revolution's descent into madness is grossly oversimplified for the purpose of explaining how the guillotine developed and where the multitude of 1792 machines came from. There is however a sense of loss of direction and ideals when the leaders, after advocating Liberty, Equality and Brotherhood, writing a Bill of Human Rights, emancipating slaves, promoting women, casting down privileges and capricious laws, promoting freedom of speech and religion start repressing ideas, start killing off people in a mass-paranoia for exercising their newly gained liberties... going on to repress religion, start killing eachother for political gain... They use mock trials to sentence anyone to death if they deem they "might" not agree with them.
The ease of the death by guillotine may have been a contributing factor to the bloodshed of "The Terror" but one must not forget the tens of thousands that were sommarily shot, drowned or executed by cannon in the ruthless repression in the provinces. Those victims by far exceed the number of those that were beheaded. I see Robespierre as a man with noble ideas (he first proposed that the death penalty be abolished) that got caught up in the cause and completely lost sight of the purpose, bending all principles in the pursuit of power. I cannot forgive him for having Danton and his followers executed for personal political gain. I have always regarded Danton as the greater mind and the more humanitarian side of the Revolution that might have tempered it.
Re: 1790's and guillotine
Which Civil War? We had a village Fete here a few years ago, with a Civil War theme - but when the re-enactors turned up, they were in Covered Wagons and dressed as Union and Confederate: the village organisers had booked the wrong Civil War! I suppose we'll get some Napoleonic re-enactments in 2012 and 2015, which I'm looking forward to because I love the uniforms...
Strangely, in the popular image of the Revolution (outside France), the deaths at Nantes and Lyon are ignored - it's always Paris and the guillotine that is emphasised, and with wildly exaggerated death tolls. I presume it is because of the incongruity of the idea that the 'Age of Reason' should produce something as paradoxical as a 'humane' machine for killing human beings! Meanwhile, we seem blasé about deaths by bullet or cannon fire...that's somehow regarded as 'natural'!
I think it's unfair to blame Robespierre for Danton's death: on 9th Thermidor Robespierre was accused of both killing Danton AND of defending him (!!) - he had earlier defended him at the Cordeliers, and tried to defend Desmoulins at the Jacobins, and was reportedly defending Danton against demands for his arrest within the Comité de Salut Public until the last minute - then helped to draft their accusation (!). Danton and co. must have thought he was still inclined towards them, as they called for him twice as a witness at their trial, to no avail. I don't think it was about personal gain - of all the existing members of the CSP at that time, had Danton attempted to defend Fabre and brought the government down (his motives still seem unclear), Robespierre would probably have survived such a coup. I think it was a matter of maintaining government stability, striking Left and then Right, regardless of the human cost to people who were once personal friends. It is very much in the Roman / Spartan civic spirit believed to be 'noble' at the time - like David's painting of Brutus with the bodies of his sons - but from a human point of view, chilling.
I think it's tragic that the Indulgents didn't wait until the spring to launch their campaign: their timing was bad: even friends like Freron were warning Desmoulins that, living in Paris, he failed to appreciate the difficulties on the front line. I know what you mean about Danton and Desmoulins (who I particularly like) being more warmly 'human', but it was perhaps easier to be humane in the semi-retirement, with families, they were both living in at the time, far harder when living the incredibly stressful 24/7 atmosphere of government, when nerves must have been stretched to breaking point - I always wonder how they managed to function at all under so many stresses, national and personal.