[identity profile] victoriavandal.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] revolution_fr
On page 792 of the hardback US Edition of Schama's 'Citizens', he winds up his chapter 'Terror is the order of the day' with the lines "Commenting on the Revolution of the 10th August, Robespierre had rejoiced that 'a river of blood would now divide France from her enemies'"

Leaving aside that horrific 'rejoiced' - cos, yeah, he did it for the lulz! - I've only ever heard those 'river of blood' words attributed to Danton. Did Robespierre ever use the same words?

Date: 2009-08-24 11:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
I searched Google Books with the words "Robespierre 'fleuve de sang'" and even then it only came up with that quote attributed to Danton. According to l'AMRID, he was also supposed to have been referring to the September Massacres, rather than 10 August. Of course, it's nothing new for Schama to misattribute quotes in order to better "prove" his point.

Date: 2009-08-25 12:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estellacat.livejournal.com
Really, it's doubly disgusting. Even if it were correctly attributed, taking a quote out of context like that, one can prove just about anything. For example, I wouldn't even have to misattribute a quote in order to "prove" that Robespierre was a royalist--all I would really have to do is take a quote about the "good prince" Louis from his 1788 pamphlet and insert it into a chapter on 1793. It's absurd how easy it is to make those kinds of falsifications. More absurd, however, is how people just seem to eat that kind of thing up!

Profile

revolution_fr: (Default)
Welcome to 1789...

February 2018

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 12 1314151617
18192021222324
25262728   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 11:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios