![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Thus I wish to share with you the 1964 TV movie La Terreur et la Vertu by Stellio Lorenzi and Alain Decaux.
Ah, the 1960s! The glorious decade of the victorious left! When the revolutionary, republican and jacobin tradition reigned over historiography!... Long before Furet’s Reaction, which brought with it films such as Wajda’s "Danton", Enrico’s "La Révolution française", De Broca’s "Chouans", Rohmer’s "L’Anglaise et le Duc", Jacquot’s "Sade", Coppola’s "Marie-Antoinette" and the Supreme Being Knows What could be next. Meh.
But that is another story. Back to La Terreur et la Vertu.
I begin with screencaps, which were made by
estellacat. I only uploaded them. :D (And yet, it was very, very, very long. >.> )
Ah, the 1960s! The glorious decade of the victorious left! When the revolutionary, republican and jacobin tradition reigned over historiography!... Long before Furet’s Reaction, which brought with it films such as Wajda’s "Danton", Enrico’s "La Révolution française", De Broca’s "Chouans", Rohmer’s "L’Anglaise et le Duc", Jacquot’s "Sade", Coppola’s "Marie-Antoinette" and the Supreme Being Knows What could be next. Meh.
But that is another story. Back to La Terreur et la Vertu.
I begin with screencaps, which were made by
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-01 11:25 pm (UTC)Ah. >.>Well, no... -_-;
no subject
Date: 2007-09-01 11:36 pm (UTC)Sorry about that... >___<;;
Really, it's only important to care about the opinions of people you respect, so it's quite all right.
On a completely unrelated note, I just saw "Les Mariés de l'an II," and it was the most absurd and farcical movie on (set during would be more accurate, because while it goes along almost like a crash course in the Revolution in the provinces, it's not really about it) the Revolution I have ever seen. Not that that necessarily makes it bad though. (To cut a very long story short, though it portrays everyone absurdly, the royalists are worse off in the portrayal--the Hébertiste in charge in the protagonist's city is even recalled by the CSP, while royalists do things like shoot innocent people in the chest and then steal their jewelry, and abduct people.) /digression
no subject
Date: 2007-09-02 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-02 12:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-02 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-02 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-02 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-02 12:29 am (UTC)Not to mention being murderous, incestuous, and very bad at fighting--two aristos armed with swords are beaten by the protagonist with a wooden pitchfork.no subject
Date: 2007-09-02 12:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-02 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-02 03:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-02 06:34 am (UTC)I don't know that it's the best example; after all, in the epilogue the protagonist gets a title under the empire, but it's better than nothing.