[identity profile] citoyenneclark.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] revolution_fr

Today, I typed in Robespierre death penalty, trying to find a copy of his speech. Instead, I came across this:
http://www.termpapers-termpapers.com/dbs/a3/bqg260.shtml

Which, besides the sad fact that some idiot out there, is probably trying to pass off this sorry peice of work as a term paper, it is another paper about how evil and power hungry Robespeirre was. 
Oh well, back to studying for finals. :(
btw: Marat's chapter should be up once I finish finals...

Date: 2008-06-01 12:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] victoriavandal.livejournal.com
That's just bizarre - I'm reading stuff on what used to be called the 'English Revolution' (till 1789) but is now less controversially called the 'civil war', and one of the reasons the New Model Army was succesful was because they were unusually disciplined (fined for swearing etc), whilst other armies regarded looting as part of their pay, and it wasn't treated as an offence - even though it meant soldiers leaving the battlefield midway through! Saint-Just was, shall we say, very enthusiastic about discipline, but no more so than in world war 1.

You get that Schama attitude in the play 'Poor Bitos' - the Bitos/ Robespierre character is 'bad' because he has sentenced a collaborator with the Nazis, whose acts led to French deaths, to death, even though the collaborator was a childhood acquaintance. The play implies that a judge who ISN"T biased towards an aquaintance is bad! (And Anouilh makes the Nazi collaborator parallel Desmoulins, yeah, right). (It would be interesting to see the war records of the revisionist historians!).

On your chaos point, my father used to work in Africa - he once took us to Lagos, Nigeria, as a bad 'joke': there were execution posts on the beach (it wasn't a tourist place!), shiny Mercedes cars literally driving over dried leather shapes that were once people on the roads: I thought, this is what the 18thC Europe was like. Most of Africa is absolutely screwed because of the corruption, but Libya wasn't - my father once turned up to a meeting to find that the man he was supposed to be meeting had just been summarily executed - literally, shot on the spot - for corruption. My father was both horrified and impressed - Gadaffi didn't tolerate any shit, and Libya was unusual in Africa because as a nation, it 'worked'. I'm not saying it's a great regime, but compared to the rest of the continent...which reminds me, there's an online resource for the Coleridge / Southey play The Fall of Robespierre (actually, there are a few, but one is excellent), which has the newspaper reports of 9-10Thermidor: the London Times' editorial is - surprisingly - oh shit, Robespierre was the stabilizing factor, now there'll be chaos! (And they were right - cue 20 years of war...).

Another Africa point - did you see the bit of newsreel from Libya a few months ago? At the start of the 'trouble' - I don't really know what to call it - they showed a non-violent political demo led by a very articulate student: they were all wearing green leaf cocardes...then, a few days later, it all got violent, tribal and horrible...

Date: 2008-06-01 01:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] victoriavandal.livejournal.com
Oh,on my last paragraph there, I mean Kenya, not Libya...

Profile

revolution_fr: (Default)
Welcome to 1789...

February 2018

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11 12 1314151617
18192021222324
25262728   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 20th, 2026 04:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios